Data & Methodology — Richland County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Richland County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

31 well testing events on record, covering 19 analytes. Data spans 1945 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. WI Avg
Manganese 24 1945–1991 88%
118% of limit ~ typical
Iron 24 1945–1991 88%
67% of limit ↓ 72% below
PFOS municipal 14 2022–2023 7%
166% of limit ↑ 180% above
Arsenic 4 1976–1980 50%
20% of limit ↑ 29% above
Chloride 24 1945–1991 100%
1% of limit ↓ 69% below
Fluoride 21 1945–1991 90%
2% of limit ↓ 47% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 14 2022–2023 0%
— —
Lead 4 1976–1980 0%
— —
Nitrate 19 1962–1991 84%
4% of limit ↓ 75% below
Nitrite 8 1962–1991 38%
0% of limit ↓ 100% below
PFHxS municipal 14 2022–2023 7%
11% of limit ~ typical
PFNA municipal 14 2022–2023 14%
2% of limit ↓ 43% below
PFOA municipal 14 2022–2023 43%
6% of limit ↓ 59% below
Sulfate 24 1945–1991 100%
6% of limit ↓ 21% below
Uranium 1 1980 0%
— —
Hardness 24 1945–1991 100%
— ~ typical
PFBS municipal 14 2022–2023 7%
— ↑ 120% above
pH 25 1945–1991 100%
— ~ typical
Sodium 15 1970–1991 100%
— ↓ 77% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across WI.

Compare your result with Richland County

Of the 24 chloride tests on record for Richland County (1945–1991), 0% found none, and half were below 3.5 mg/L.

Of the 21 fluoride tests on record for Richland County (1945–1991), 10% found none, and half were below 100 µg/L.

Of the 24 iron tests on record for Richland County (1945–1991), 12% found none, and half were below 95 µg/L.

Of the 24 manganese tests on record for Richland County (1945–1991), 12% found none, and half were below 30 µg/L.

Of the 24 sulfate tests on record for Richland County (1945–1991), 0% found none, and half were below 14 mg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 24 samples
  • Iron 24 samples
  • Chloride 24 samples
  • Fluoride 21 samples
  • Nitrate 19 samples
  • Sulfate 24 samples
  • Hardness 24 samples
  • pH 25 samples
  • Sodium 15 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • PFOS 14 samples
  • Arsenic 4 samples
  • HFPO-DA (GenX) 14 samples
  • Lead 4 samples
  • Nitrite 8 samples
  • PFHxS 14 samples
  • PFNA 14 samples
  • PFOA 14 samples
  • Uranium 1 sample
  • PFBS 14 samples

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Richland County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Richland County Prevalence WI Average Source Year
PFOS Cancer prevalence 6.0% 7.0% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Richland County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in WI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →