Data & Methodology — Dallas County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Dallas County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

778 well testing events on record, covering 22 analytes. Data spans 1964 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 415 1938–2019 72%
33% of limit
PFOA municipal 162 2023–2025 9%
110% of limit
PFOS municipal 162 2023–2025 8%
110% of limit
Fluoride 669 1938–2019 100%
48% of limit
Manganese 324 1938–2019 29%
8% of limit
Arsenic 81 1993–2019 11%
28% of limit
Chloride 1 2016 100%
32% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 162 2023–2025 0%
Lead 81 1993–2019 2%
9% of limit
Nitrate 32 1975–2016 69%
0% of limit
Nitrite 1 2016 0%
PFHxS municipal 162 2023–2025 7%
34% of limit
PFNA municipal 162 2023–2025 0%
Radon 1 2016 100%
78% of limit
Sulfate 1 2016 100%
85% of limit
Uranium 15 2010–2019 13%
2% of limit
Total Coliform 1 2016 0%
Sodium 1 2016 100%
pH 1 2016 100%
PFBS municipal 162 2023–2025 66%
Hardness 1 2016 100%
E. coli 1 2016 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 415 samples
  • Fluoride 669 samples
  • Manganese 324 samples
  • Arsenic 81 samples
  • Lead 81 samples
  • Nitrate 32 samples
  • Uranium 15 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Radon 1 sample
  • Sulfate 1 sample
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • Sodium 1 sample
  • pH 1 sample
  • Hardness 1 sample
  • E. coli 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Dallas County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Dallas County. PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Dallas County

37 Active public water systems
3,181,758 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Dallas County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Dallas County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Dallas County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.2% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.1% 3.3% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Dallas County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →