Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Williamson County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
1181 well testing events on record, covering
22 analytes.
Data spans 1962 to 2025.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. TX Avg
Radon
3
2016–2017
100%
107% of limit
↑ 196% above
Iron
419
1938–2022
74%
57% of limit
↓ 63% below
Fluoride
1032
1938–2022
99%
50% of limit
↑ 109% above
Sulfate
60
1977–2022
100%
8% of limit
↓ 72% below
PFOS
municipal
123
2023–2025
4%
125% of limit
~ typical
Nitrate
102
1972–2022
76%
17% of limit
↓ 25% below
PFOA
municipal
123
2023–2025
3%
124% of limit
~ typical
Manganese
354
1938–2022
26%
8% of limit
↓ 88% below
Lead
137
1977–2022
9%
8% of limit
↓ 53% below
Chloride
60
1977–2022
100%
6% of limit
↓ 83% below
Arsenic
131
1977–2022
32%
4% of limit
↓ 88% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
123
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrite
54
1987–2022
19%
1% of limit
↓ 42% below
PFHxS
municipal
123
2023–2025
15%
37% of limit
~ typical
PFNA
municipal
123
2023–2025
1%
50% of limit
↓ 60% below
Uranium
57
2007–2022
54%
2% of limit
↓ 86% below
E. coli
3
2016–2017
33%
—
~ typical
Hardness
61
1977–2022
100%
—
↑ 44% above
PFBS
municipal
123
2023–2025
37%
—
↑ 26% above
pH
134
1977–2022
100%
—
~ typical
Sodium
61
1977–2022
100%
—
↓ 91% below
Total Coliform
3
2016–2017
33%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.
Compare your result with Williamson County
Of the 131 arsenic tests on record for Williamson County (1977–2022),
68% found none.
Of the 60 chloride tests on record for Williamson County (1977–2022),
0% found none, and half were below 15 mg/L.
Of the 1032 fluoride tests on record for Williamson County (1938–2022),
1% found none, and half were below 1.9 mg/L.
Of the 419 iron tests on record for Williamson County (1938–2022),
26% found none, and half were below 100 µg/L.
Of the 137 lead tests on record for Williamson County (1977–2022),
91% found none.
Of the 354 manganese tests on record for Williamson County (1938–2022),
74% found none.
Of the 102 nitrate tests on record for Williamson County (1972–2022),
24% found none, and half were below 1.3 mg/L.
Of the 60 sulfate tests on record for Williamson County (1977–2022),
0% found none, and half were below 19.6 mg/L.
Of the 57 uranium tests on record for Williamson County (2007–2022),
46% found none, and half were below 55 ng/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Iron 419 samples
Fluoride 1032 samples
Sulfate 60 samples
Nitrate 102 samples
Manganese 354 samples
Lead 137 samples
Chloride 60 samples
Arsenic 131 samples
Nitrite 54 samples
Uranium 57 samples
Hardness 61 samples
pH 134 samples
Sodium 61 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Radon 3 samples
E. coli 3 samples
Total Coliform 3 samples
No private-well PFAS data for Williamson County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Williamson County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Williamson County
51Active public water systems
703,121Residents on public water
2%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Williamson County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Williamson County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Williamson County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Williamson County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Williamson County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Williamson County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Williamson County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.