Data & Methodology — Titus County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Titus County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

124 well testing events on record, covering 18 analytes. Data spans 1942 to 2015.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Manganese 21 1963–2018 90%
37% of limit ↓ 42% below
Iron 68 1942–2018 94%
33% of limit ↓ 78% below
Chloride 25 1942–1976 100%
20% of limit ↓ 44% below
Sulfate 25 1942–1976 100%
1% of limit ↓ 97% below
Arsenic 17 1993–2018 6%
16% of limit ↓ 57% below
Fluoride 113 1942–2018 94%
5% of limit ↓ 79% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 8 2023–2025 0%
— —
Lead 17 1993–2018 24%
9% of limit ↓ 45% below
Nitrate 27 1942–1993 89%
4% of limit ↓ 80% below
PFHxS municipal 8 2023–2025 0%
— —
PFNA municipal 8 2023–2025 0%
— —
PFOA municipal 8 2023–2025 0%
— —
PFOS municipal 8 2023–2025 0%
— —
Uranium 6 2010–2018 0%
— —
Hardness 25 1942–1976 100%
— ↓ 93% below
PFBS municipal 8 2023–2025 0%
— —
pH 24 1942–1976 100%
— ~ typical
Sodium 25 1942–1976 100%
— ~ typical

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Compare your result with Titus County

Of the 25 chloride tests on record for Titus County (1942–1976), 0% found none, and half were below 50 mg/L.

Of the 113 fluoride tests on record for Titus County (1942–2018), 6% found none, and half were below 200 µg/L.

Of the 68 iron tests on record for Titus County (1942–2018), 6% found none, and half were below 88.5 µg/L.

Of the 21 manganese tests on record for Titus County (1963–2018), 10% found none, and half were below 11.8 µg/L.

Of the 27 nitrate tests on record for Titus County (1942–1993), 11% found none, and half were below 200 µg/L.

Of the 25 sulfate tests on record for Titus County (1942–1976), 0% found none, and half were below 2 mg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 21 samples
  • Iron 68 samples
  • Chloride 25 samples
  • Sulfate 25 samples
  • Arsenic 17 samples
  • Fluoride 113 samples
  • Lead 17 samples
  • Nitrate 27 samples
  • Hardness 25 samples
  • pH 24 samples
  • Sodium 25 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Uranium 6 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Titus County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Titus County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Titus County

6 Active public water systems
35,946 Residents on public water
2% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Titus County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →