Data & Methodology — Sutton County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Sutton County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

510 well testing events on record, covering 16 analytes. Data spans 2017 to 2017.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 199 1938–2019 14%
10% of limit ↓ 94% below
Manganese 196 1938–2019 12%
6% of limit ↓ 90% below
Fluoride 508 1938–2019 97%
11% of limit ↓ 54% below
Arsenic 185 1989–2019 26%
12% of limit ↓ 67% below
Chloride 1 2017 100%
7% of limit ↓ 82% below
Lead 186 1989–2019 9%
9% of limit ↓ 49% below
Nitrate 8 1993–2017 100%
17% of limit ↓ 23% below
Nitrite 1 2017 0%
— —
Radon 1 2017 100%
59% of limit ↑ 65% above
Sulfate 1 2017 100%
4% of limit ↓ 87% below
Uranium 139 2010–2019 99%
5% of limit ↓ 65% below
pH 1 2017 100%
— ~ typical
Sodium 1 2017 100%
— ↓ 90% below
Total Coliform 1 2017 0%
— —
E. coli 1 2017 0%
— —
Hardness 1 2017 100%
— ~ typical

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Compare your result with Sutton County

Of the 185 arsenic tests on record for Sutton County (1989–2019), 74% found none.

Of the 508 fluoride tests on record for Sutton County (1938–2019), 3% found none, and half were below 420 µg/L.

Of the 199 iron tests on record for Sutton County (1938–2019), 86% found none.

Of the 186 lead tests on record for Sutton County (1989–2019), 91% found none.

Of the 196 manganese tests on record for Sutton County (1938–2019), 88% found none.

Of the 139 uranium tests on record for Sutton County (2010–2019), 1% found none, and half were below 1.6 µg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 199 samples
  • Manganese 196 samples
  • Fluoride 508 samples
  • Arsenic 185 samples
  • Lead 186 samples
  • Uranium 139 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 1 sample
  • Nitrate 8 samples
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Radon 1 sample
  • Sulfate 1 sample
  • pH 1 sample
  • Sodium 1 sample
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • E. coli 1 sample
  • Hardness 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Sutton County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Sutton County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Sutton County

4 Active public water systems
3,272 Residents on public water
13% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Sutton County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →