Data & Methodology — Somervell County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Somervell County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

70 well testing events on record, covering 7 analytes. Data spans 1961 to 2004.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 37 1937–2019 73%
23% of limit
Arsenic 22 1988–2019 0%
Fluoride 68 1937–2019 100%
8% of limit
Lead 22 1988–2019 23%
13% of limit
Manganese 38 1948–2019 45%
9% of limit
Nitrate 13 1980–2003 46%
0% of limit
Uranium 3 2011–2019 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 37 samples
  • Arsenic 22 samples
  • Fluoride 68 samples
  • Lead 22 samples
  • Manganese 38 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrate 13 samples
  • Uranium 3 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Somervell County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Somervell County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Somervell County

12 Active public water systems
12,585 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Somervell County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →