Data & Methodology — Mason County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Mason County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

336 well testing events on record, covering 7 analytes. Data spans 2009 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 175 1947–2021 54%
23% of limit ↓ 85% below
Nitrate 14 1989–1994 100%
43% of limit ↑ 92% above
Manganese 80 1947–2021 29%
26% of limit ↓ 60% below
Arsenic 72 1988–2021 10%
29% of limit ↓ 23% below
Fluoride 329 1939–2021 98%
13% of limit ↓ 46% below
Lead 72 1988–2021 28%
16% of limit ~ typical
Uranium 24 2008–2021 67%
7% of limit ↓ 54% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Compare your result with Mason County

Of the 72 arsenic tests on record for Mason County (1988–2021), 90% found none.

Of the 329 fluoride tests on record for Mason County (1939–2021), 2% found none, and half were below 500 µg/L.

Of the 175 iron tests on record for Mason County (1947–2021), 46% found none, and half were below 16 µg/L.

Of the 72 lead tests on record for Mason County (1988–2021), 72% found none.

Of the 80 manganese tests on record for Mason County (1947–2021), 71% found none.

Of the 24 uranium tests on record for Mason County (2008–2021), 33% found none, and half were below 1.3 µg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 175 samples
  • Manganese 80 samples
  • Arsenic 72 samples
  • Fluoride 329 samples
  • Lead 72 samples
  • Uranium 24 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrate 14 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Mason County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Mason County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Mason County

1 Active public water systems
2,228 Residents on public water
37% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Mason County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Mason County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Mason County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Nitrate Cancer prevalence 5.8% 6.1% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Mason County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →