Data & Methodology — Burnet County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Burnet County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

309 well testing events on record, covering 22 analytes. Data spans 1963 to 2025.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Chloride 11 2013–2016 100%
10% of limit
Iron 181 1938–2021 44%
33% of limit
Nitrate 37 1967–2016 76%
16% of limit
Manganese 173 1940–2021 38%
8% of limit
Fluoride 292 1938–2021 94%
9% of limit
Lead 135 1979–2021 14%
10% of limit
Arsenic 140 1979–2021 15%
10% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 11 2023–2025 0%
Nitrite 11 2013–2016 0%
PFHxS municipal 11 2023–2025 9%
30% of limit
PFNA municipal 11 2023–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 11 2023–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 11 2023–2025 0%
Radon 1 2016 100%
60% of limit
Sulfate 11 2013–2016 100%
11% of limit
Uranium 85 1990–2021 54%
5% of limit
Total Coliform 1 2016 100%
Sodium 11 2013–2016 100%
pH 11 2013–2016 100%
PFBS municipal 11 2023–2025 18%
Hardness 11 2013–2016 100%
E. coli 1 2016 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 181 samples
  • Nitrate 37 samples
  • Manganese 173 samples
  • Fluoride 292 samples
  • Lead 135 samples
  • Arsenic 140 samples
  • Uranium 85 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 11 samples
  • Nitrite 11 samples
  • Radon 1 sample
  • Sulfate 11 samples
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • Sodium 11 samples
  • pH 11 samples
  • Hardness 11 samples
  • E. coli 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Burnet County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Burnet County. PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Burnet County

70 Active public water systems
44,930 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Burnet County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Burnet County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Burnet County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Nitrate Cancer prevalence 5.8% 6.1% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 6.1% 7.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Burnet County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →