Data & Methodology — Anderson County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Anderson County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

503 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1964 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 378 1940–2018 77%
53% of limit
Manganese 174 1941–2018 71%
15% of limit
Nitrate 32 1968–2015 66%
4% of limit
Lead 124 1970–2018 13%
10% of limit
Arsenic 125 1989–2018 10%
15% of limit
Chloride 11 1968–2015 100%
5% of limit
Fluoride 459 1940–2018 83%
5% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 38 2023–2025 0%
Nitrite 1 2015 0%
PFHxS municipal 38 2023–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 38 2023–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 38 2023–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 38 2023–2025 0%
Radon 1 2015 100%
81% of limit
Sulfate 11 1968–2015 100%
6% of limit
Uranium 44 2010–2018 2%
0% of limit
PFBS municipal 38 2023–2025 0%
Hardness 11 1968–2015 100%
Sodium 11 1968–2015 100%
pH 11 1968–2015 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 378 samples
  • Manganese 174 samples
  • Nitrate 32 samples
  • Lead 124 samples
  • Arsenic 125 samples
  • Fluoride 459 samples
  • Uranium 44 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 11 samples
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Radon 1 sample
  • Sulfate 11 samples
  • Hardness 11 samples
  • Sodium 11 samples
  • pH 11 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Anderson County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Anderson County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Anderson County

29 Active public water systems
88,313 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Anderson County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Anderson County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Anderson County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.3% 3.3% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 7.5% 7.4% 2020
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 6.0% 6.1% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Anderson County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →