Data & Methodology — McKean County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for McKean County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

16996 total samples analyzed across 23 analytes. Data spans 1928 to 2025.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. PA Avg
Iron 7 1928–1968 86%
302% of limit ~ typical
Radon 10 1996–2019 100%
18% of limit ↓ 90% below
Chloride 98 1928–2025 100%
5% of limit ↓ 67% below
Sulfate 33 1928–2021 97%
4% of limit ↓ 89% below
Fluoride 3 1968–1974 67%
4% of limit ~ typical
Manganese 2 1968 50%
20% of limit ↓ 97% below
Arsenic 5 1973–1979 80%
40% of limit ~ typical
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 8 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 8 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 8 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 8 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit ↓ 100% below
PFOA municipal 8 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit ↓ 100% below
Uranium 5 2016–2019 80%
2% of limit ↓ 40% below
E. coli 1 2019 0%
Total Coliform 1 2019 0%
Fecal Coliform 1 2005 0%
PFBS municipal 8 2024–2025 0%
↓ 100% below
Nitrate 1 1935 0%
pH 12 1963–2023 100% ~ typical
Hardness 1 2003 0%
Lead 1 1972 0%
Nitrite 1 1973 0%
Sodium 79 1928–2025 99% ↓ 86% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across PA.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Chloride 98 samples
  • Sulfate 33 samples
  • Sodium 79 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Iron 7 samples
  • Radon 10 samples
  • Fluoride 3 samples
  • Manganese 2 samples
  • Arsenic 5 samples
  • Uranium 5 samples
  • E. coli 1 sample
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • pH 12 samples
  • Hardness 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for McKean County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in McKean County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in McKean County

56 Active public water systems
39,890 Residents on public water
1% Households on private wells

Public water systems in McKean County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in McKean County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition McKean County Prevalence PA Average Source Year
Radon Cancer prevalence 6.1% 7.0% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download McKean County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in PA with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →