Data & Methodology — Williams County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Williams County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

7642 total samples analyzed across 22 analytes. Data spans 1965 to 2024.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. OH Avg
Iron 47 1965–1998 98%
262% of limit ↓ 52% below
Manganese 34 1965–1985 97%
54% of limit ↓ 87% below
Arsenic 15 1975–2016 93%
29% of limit ↓ 38% below
Chloride 59 1965–2019 100%
15% of limit ↓ 66% below
Sulfate 58 1965–2014 98%
13% of limit ↓ 78% below
Lead 9 1985–2016 89%
7% of limit ↓ 76% below
Radon 10 1998–2002 100%
30% of limit ↓ 65% below
Uranium 9 2002–2016 100%
1% of limit ↓ 59% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
0% of limit
PFOA municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
0% of limit
Fluoride 22 1966–2007 100%
18% of limit ~ typical
Sodium 58 1973–2019 100% ↓ 63% below
Hardness 19 1986–2014 100% ↓ 31% below
Nitrate 1 1972 0%
pH 9 1967–2024 100% ~ typical
PFBS municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
Total Coliform 1 2007 0%
E. coli 1 2007 0%
Nitrite 1 1995 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across OH.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 47 samples
  • Manganese 34 samples
  • Arsenic 15 samples
  • Chloride 59 samples
  • Sulfate 58 samples
  • Fluoride 22 samples
  • Sodium 58 samples
  • Hardness 19 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Lead 9 samples
  • Radon 10 samples
  • Uranium 9 samples
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • pH 9 samples
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • E. coli 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Williams County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Williams County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Williams County

44 Active public water systems
27,059 Residents on public water
27% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Williams County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Williams County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Williams County Prevalence OH Average Source Year
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.3% 3.1% 2020
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 7.9% 6.8% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Williams County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in OH with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →