Data & Methodology — Summit County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Summit County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

28980 total samples analyzed across 21 analytes. Data spans 1964 to 2018.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. OH Avg
Manganese 31 1964–1979 97%
370% of limit ~ typical
Iron 62 1964–2000 98%
170% of limit ↓ 69% below
Chloride 84 1964–2017 100%
54% of limit ↑ 24% above
Sulfate 56 1964–2018 100%
25% of limit ↓ 57% below
Fluoride 20 1964–2002 95%
8% of limit ↓ 50% below
PFOA municipal 27 2023–2025 4%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 27 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 27 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 27 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 27 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
Arsenic 1 1970 0%
Nitrate 1 1976 0%
PFBS municipal 27 2023–2025 0%
E. coli 1 1990 0%
Sodium 61 1974–2018 100% ~ typical
Fecal Coliform 1 1987 0%
pH 10 1964–2014 100% ~ typical
Uranium 1 2016 0%
Lead 1 1970 0%
Nitrite 1 1980 0%
Hardness 37 1995–2018 100% ↓ 38% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across OH.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 31 samples
  • Iron 62 samples
  • Chloride 84 samples
  • Sulfate 56 samples
  • Fluoride 20 samples
  • Sodium 61 samples
  • Hardness 37 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Arsenic 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • E. coli 1 sample
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • pH 10 samples
  • Uranium 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Summit County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Summit County. PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Summit County

212 Active public water systems
467,460 Residents on public water
13% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Summit County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Summit County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Summit County Prevalence OH Average Source Year
PFOA Cancer prevalence 7.3% 6.8% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Summit County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in OH with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →