Data & Methodology — Noble County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Noble County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

4571 total samples analyzed across 19 analytes. Data spans 1966 to 2016.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. OH Avg
Manganese 27 1974–1979 96%
650% of limit ↑ 52% above
PFOA municipal 3 2025 67%
275% of limit
Iron 84 1974–2016 100%
149% of limit ↓ 73% below
Sulfate 59 1967–2016 100%
66% of limit ~ typical
Lead 15 2000–2015 93%
44% of limit ↑ 48% above
PFHxS municipal 3 2025 0%
0% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 3 2025 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 3 2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 3 2025 0%
0% of limit
Arsenic 4 1975–1979 75%
20% of limit ↓ 58% below
Nitrite 19 2000–2012 95%
5% of limit ↓ 51% below
Chloride 48 1966–2015 98%
8% of limit ↓ 82% below
Fluoride 14 1972–2015 100%
4% of limit ↓ 77% below
Fecal Coliform 1 1976 0%
Nitrate 1 1976 0%
Hardness 30 1999–2014 100% ~ typical
Sodium 48 1974–2016 100% ↓ 68% below
PFBS municipal 3 2025 0%
pH 11 1966–1982 100% ~ typical

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across OH.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 27 samples
  • Iron 84 samples
  • Sulfate 59 samples
  • Lead 15 samples
  • Nitrite 19 samples
  • Chloride 48 samples
  • Hardness 30 samples
  • Sodium 48 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Arsenic 4 samples
  • Fluoride 14 samples
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • pH 11 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Noble County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Noble County. PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Noble County

6 Active public water systems
11,421 Residents on public water
20% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Noble County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Noble County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Noble County Prevalence OH Average Source Year
PFOA Cancer prevalence 9.5% 6.8% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 7.5% 7.6% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Noble County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in OH with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →