Data & Methodology — Ashland County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Ashland County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

7330 total samples analyzed across 23 analytes. Data spans 1965 to 2013.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. OH Avg
Radon 1 2013 100%
173% of limit ↑ 104% above
Manganese 18 1973–2013 94%
240% of limit ↓ 44% below
Iron 28 1973–1995 96%
57% of limit ↓ 90% below
Arsenic 9 1975–2013 89%
45% of limit ~ typical
Sulfate 42 1967–2013 100%
29% of limit ↓ 50% below
Chloride 60 1965–2013 100%
14% of limit ↓ 68% below
PFOS municipal 2 2023 0%
0% of limit
PFOA municipal 2 2023 0%
0% of limit
Uranium 1 2013 100%
1% of limit ↓ 54% below
Lead 2 1975–2013 50%
1% of limit ↓ 96% below
Nitrite 2 1975–1995 50%
2% of limit ↓ 81% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 2 2023 0%
0% of limit
Fluoride 16 1968–2013 94%
8% of limit ↓ 56% below
PFNA municipal 2 2023 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 2 2023 0%
0% of limit
Sodium 39 1973–1995 97% ↓ 69% below
Fecal Coliform 1 1991 0%
Total Coliform 1 2013 0%
Hardness 28 1973–2008 100% ↓ 32% below
PFBS municipal 2 2023 0%
Nitrate 1 1978 0%
pH 8 1967–2010 100% ~ typical
E. coli 1 2013 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across OH.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 18 samples
  • Iron 28 samples
  • Sulfate 42 samples
  • Chloride 60 samples
  • Fluoride 16 samples
  • Sodium 39 samples
  • Hardness 28 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Radon 1 sample
  • Arsenic 9 samples
  • Uranium 1 sample
  • Lead 2 samples
  • Nitrite 2 samples
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • pH 8 samples
  • E. coli 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Ashland County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Ashland County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Ashland County

50 Active public water systems
34,353 Residents on public water
35% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Ashland County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Ashland County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Ashland County Prevalence OH Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 7.8% 6.8% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.3% 3.1% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Ashland County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in OH with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →