Data & Methodology — Yadkin County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Yadkin County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

5543 total samples analyzed across 32 analytes. Data spans 1954 to 2025.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. NC Avg
Manganese 5 1973–2014 80%
209% of limit ↑ 83% above
Radon 5 2007–2014 100%
370% of limit ↑ 163% above
Arsenic 4 1973–2014 75%
5% of limit ↓ 92% below
Sulfate 32 1954–2025 97%
1% of limit ↓ 80% below
Lead 4 1974–2007 75%
1% of limit ↓ 96% below
Uranium 2 2007–2014 100%
2% of limit ↑ 594% above
PFOS municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
PFOA municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
Chloride 28 1954–2024 100%
1% of limit ↓ 88% below
PFNA municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
Fluoride 2 1954–1959 50%
2% of limit ↓ 50% below
Chloride 28 1954–2024 100%
1% of limit ↓ 88% below
PFOA municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 6 2024 0%
0% of limit
Sulfate 32 1954–2025 97%
1% of limit ↓ 80% below
Fluoride 2 1954–1959 50%
2% of limit ↓ 50% below
Lead 4 1974–2007 75%
1% of limit ↓ 96% below
Arsenic 4 1973–2014 75%
5% of limit ↓ 92% below
Uranium 2 2007–2014 100%
2% of limit ↑ 594% above
pH 9 1954–2025 100% ~ typical
Sodium 24 1954–2024 100% ↓ 79% below
PFBS municipal 6 2024 17%
Iron 1 1954 0%
Nitrate 1 1960 0%
E. coli 1 2007 0%
Nitrite 1 2014 0%
Fecal Coliform 1 1980 0%
Hardness 19 1983–1996 100% ↓ 58% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across NC.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Sulfate 32 samples
  • Chloride 28 samples
  • Chloride 28 samples
  • Sulfate 32 samples
  • Sodium 24 samples
  • Hardness 19 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Manganese 5 samples
  • Radon 5 samples
  • Arsenic 4 samples
  • Lead 4 samples
  • Uranium 2 samples
  • Fluoride 2 samples
  • Fluoride 2 samples
  • Lead 4 samples
  • Arsenic 4 samples
  • Uranium 2 samples
  • pH 9 samples
  • Iron 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • E. coli 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Yadkin County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Yadkin County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Yadkin County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Yadkin County Prevalence NC Average Source Year
Radon Cancer prevalence 8.0% 6.7% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Yadkin County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in NC with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →