Data & Methodology — Swift County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Swift County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

108 well testing events on record, covering 17 analytes. Data spans 1960 to 2024.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MN Avg
Iron 59 1963–2006 100%
517% of limit ~ typical
Manganese 58 1963–2004 100%
291% of limit ↓ 23% below
PFOA 4 2007 50%
412% of limit ↑ 10900% above
Arsenic 9 1985–2004 56%
115% of limit ↑ 43% above
Sulfate 68 1963–2014 100%
40% of limit ↑ 68% above
Chloride 97 1963–2025 99%
2% of limit ↓ 84% below
Fluoride 58 1963–2004 100%
7% of limit ↓ 21% below
Lead 6 1995–2004 67%
4% of limit ↓ 93% below
Nitrate 40 1963–2006 80%
0% of limit ↓ 99% below
Nitrite 26 1991–2004 85%
0% of limit ↓ 95% below
PFHxS 2 100%
65% of limit
PFNA 2 2007 0%
Uranium 1 2004 100%
0% of limit ↓ 98% below
Hardness 31 1963–1985 100%
↑ 23% above
PFBS 1 100%
pH 32 1964–1993 100%
~ typical
Sodium 57 1964–2004 100%
↓ 51% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MN.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 59 samples
  • Manganese 58 samples
  • Sulfate 68 samples
  • Chloride 97 samples
  • Fluoride 58 samples
  • Nitrate 40 samples
  • Nitrite 26 samples
  • Hardness 31 samples
  • pH 32 samples
  • Sodium 57 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • PFOA 4 samples
  • Arsenic 9 samples
  • Lead 6 samples
  • PFHxS 2 samples
  • PFNA 2 samples
  • Uranium 1 sample
  • PFBS 1 sample

Public vs. Private Water in Swift County

21 Active public water systems
6,837 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Swift County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Swift County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Swift County Prevalence MN Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 8.5% 7.0% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.6% 2.9% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 8.5% 6.6% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Swift County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MN with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →