Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Chisago County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
224 well testing events on record, covering
20 analytes.
Data spans 1967 to 2024.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. MN Avg
Radon
1
2014
100%
140% of limit
↑ 170% above
Manganese
52
1967–2025
90%
195% of limit
↓ 60% below
Iron
143
1967–2025
90%
24% of limit
↓ 97% below
PFOA
municipal
33
2007–2025
21%
55% of limit
↓ 87% below
Chloride
191
1967–2025
100%
2% of limit
↓ 68% below
PFOS
municipal
28
2023–2025
14%
134% of limit
↓ 33% below
Arsenic
118
1978–2025
31%
30% of limit
↓ 65% below
PFHxS
municipal
26
2023–2025
15%
25% of limit
↓ 69% below
Lead
118
1978–2025
6%
29% of limit
↓ 34% below
Fluoride
122
1967–2025
93%
5% of limit
↓ 32% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
24
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrate
106
1967–2011
73%
0% of limit
↓ 99% below
Nitrite
91
2010–2011
4%
0% of limit
↓ 76% below
PFNA
municipal
28
2007–2025
0%
—
—
Sulfate
162
1967–2025
98%
3% of limit
↓ 84% below
Uranium
83
2010–2014
34%
4% of limit
~ typical
Sodium
140
1967–2025
100%
—
↓ 83% below
pH
47
1967–2015
100%
—
~ typical
PFBS
municipal
26
2023–2025
15%
—
↓ 57% below
Hardness
16
1967–2014
100%
—
↓ 57% below
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MN.
Compare your result with Chisago County
Of the 118 arsenic tests on record for Chisago County (1978–2025),
69% found none.
Of the 191 chloride tests on record for Chisago County (1967–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 6.08 mg/L.
Of the 122 fluoride tests on record for Chisago County (1967–2025),
7% found none, and half were below 176 µg/L.
Of the 143 iron tests on record for Chisago County (1967–2025),
10% found none, and half were below 50 µg/L.
Of the 118 lead tests on record for Chisago County (1978–2025),
94% found none.
Of the 52 manganese tests on record for Chisago County (1967–2025),
10% found none, and half were below 95.9 µg/L.
Of the 106 nitrate tests on record for Chisago County (1967–2011),
27% found none, and half were below 8 µg/L.
Of the 162 sulfate tests on record for Chisago County (1967–2025),
2% found none, and half were below 7.38 mg/L.
Of the 83 uranium tests on record for Chisago County (2010–2014),
66% found none.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Manganese 52 samples
Iron 143 samples
PFOA 33 samples
Chloride 191 samples
PFOS 28 samples
Arsenic 118 samples
PFHxS 26 samples
Lead 118 samples
Fluoride 122 samples
HFPO-DA (GenX) 24 samples
Nitrate 106 samples
Nitrite 91 samples
PFNA 28 samples
Sulfate 162 samples
Uranium 83 samples
Sodium 140 samples
pH 47 samples
PFBS 26 samples
Hardness 16 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Radon 1 sample
Public vs. Private Water in Chisago County
110Active public water systems
40,925Residents on public water
51%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Chisago County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Chisago County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Chisago County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Chisago County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Chisago County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Chisago County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Chisago County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MN with at least one sample for that analyte.