Data & Methodology — Schoolcraft County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Schoolcraft County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

40 well testing events on record, covering 16 analytes. Data spans 1930 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Iron 18 1930–2014 89%
146% of limit ↓ 26% below
Sulfate 26 1930–2014 100%
8% of limit ↓ 52% below
Manganese 13 1957–2014 77%
40% of limit ↓ 71% below
Chloride 25 1930–2014 100%
3% of limit ↓ 76% below
Arsenic 11 1975–2014 45%
10% of limit ↓ 69% below
Fluoride 12 1957–2014 100%
13% of limit ↑ 65% above
Lead 11 1975–2014 27%
40% of limit ↑ 275% above
Nitrate 14 1933–2014 43%
3% of limit ↓ 26% below
Nitrite 11 1975–2014 9%
1% of limit ↑ 129% above
PFNA 1 2010 0%
PFOA 3 2010–2019 0%
Radon 2 2014 100%
56% of limit ↑ 62% above
Uranium 9 1976–2014 100%
0% of limit ↓ 68% below
Hardness 34 1930–2014 100%
↑ 102% above
pH 23 1930–2014 100%
~ typical
Sodium 17 1932–2014 100%
~ typical

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 18 samples
  • Sulfate 26 samples
  • Chloride 25 samples
  • Hardness 34 samples
  • pH 23 samples
  • Sodium 17 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Manganese 13 samples
  • Arsenic 11 samples
  • Fluoride 12 samples
  • Lead 11 samples
  • Nitrate 14 samples
  • Nitrite 11 samples
  • PFNA 1 sample
  • PFOA 3 samples
  • Radon 2 samples
  • Uranium 9 samples

Public vs. Private Water in Schoolcraft County

67 Active public water systems
7,836 Residents on public water
3% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Schoolcraft County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →