Data & Methodology — Oscoda County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Oscoda County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

10 well testing events on record, covering 19 analytes. Data spans 1960 to 2019.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Arsenic 4 1979–1987 50%
25% of limit ↓ 22% below
Chloride 4 1979–1987 100%
2% of limit ↓ 87% below
Fluoride 4 1979–1987 50%
4% of limit ↓ 53% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 6 2023–2024 0%
Iron 4 1979–1987 100%
5% of limit ↓ 97% below
Lead 1 1979 0%
Manganese 4 1979–1987 75%
8% of limit ↓ 94% below
Nitrate 2 1979–1986 50%
29% of limit ↑ 625% above
Nitrite 2 1979–1986 0%
PFHxS municipal 6 2023–2024 0%
PFNA municipal 8 2014–2024 0%
PFOA municipal 8 2014–2024 0%
PFOS municipal 6 2023–2024 0%
Sulfate 4 1979–1987 100%
4% of limit ↓ 72% below
Uranium 1 1979 100%
1% of limit ~ typical
Hardness 4 1979–1987 100%
↑ 90% above
PFBS municipal 6 2023–2024 0%
pH 4 1979–1987 100%
~ typical
Sodium 4 1979–1987 100%
↓ 79% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Arsenic 4 samples
  • Chloride 4 samples
  • Fluoride 4 samples
  • Iron 4 samples
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Manganese 4 samples
  • Nitrate 2 samples
  • Nitrite 2 samples
  • PFNA 8 samples
  • PFOA 8 samples
  • Sulfate 4 samples
  • Uranium 1 sample
  • Hardness 4 samples
  • pH 4 samples
  • Sodium 4 samples

Public vs. Private Water in Oscoda County

70 Active public water systems
7,420 Residents on public water
10% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Oscoda County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →