Data & Methodology — Jackson County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Jackson County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

73 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1963 to 2022.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Iron 54 1965–2022 93%
328% of limit ↑ 66% above
Manganese 34 1975–2022 100%
94% of limit ↓ 31% below
Arsenic 27 1975–2021 74%
25% of limit ↓ 23% below
Sulfate 53 1965–2022 100%
13% of limit ↓ 21% below
Chloride 53 1965–2022 100%
3% of limit ↓ 75% below
Fluoride 33 1975–2022 100%
5% of limit ↓ 37% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 30 2023–2025 0%
Lead 12 1975–2021 33%
21% of limit ↑ 94% above
Nitrate 16 1965–2022 44%
1% of limit ↓ 77% below
Nitrite 11 1975–2022 27%
1% of limit ↑ 129% above
PFHxS municipal 30 2023–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 30 2023–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 30 2023–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 30 2023–2025 0%
Radon 1 1989 100%
12% of limit ↓ 65% below
Uranium 3 1976–1988 67%
7% of limit ↑ 621% above
Sodium 48 1967–2022 100%
↓ 72% below
pH 53 1965–2022 100%
~ typical
PFBS municipal 30 2023–2025 0%
Hardness 53 1965–2022 100%
↑ 206% above

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 54 samples
  • Manganese 34 samples
  • Arsenic 27 samples
  • Sulfate 53 samples
  • Chloride 53 samples
  • Fluoride 33 samples
  • Nitrate 16 samples
  • Sodium 48 samples
  • pH 53 samples
  • Hardness 53 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Lead 12 samples
  • Nitrite 11 samples
  • Radon 1 sample
  • Uranium 3 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Jackson County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Jackson County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Jackson County

230 Active public water systems
136,854 Residents on public water
15% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Jackson County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Jackson County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Jackson County Prevalence MI Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 9.5% 7.2% 2023
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 7.6% 7.2% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.2% 3.2% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Jackson County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →