Data & Methodology — Gratiot County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Gratiot County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

36 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1965 to 2025.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Iron 22 1965–1988 100%
258% of limit ↑ 31% above
Sulfate 22 1965–1988 100%
52% of limit ↑ 222% above
Manganese 22 1965–1988 100%
43% of limit ↓ 69% below
Arsenic 21 1976–1988 67%
45% of limit ↑ 41% above
Chloride 26 1965–1992 100%
9% of limit ↓ 24% below
PFHxS municipal 10 2024–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 10 2024–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 10 2024–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 10 2024–2025 0%
Radon 1 1989 0%
Uranium 1 1986 0%
Fluoride 21 1976–1988 95%
12% of limit ↑ 57% above
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 10 2024–2025 0%
Lead 1 1976 0%
Nitrate 2 1965–1976 100%
1% of limit ↓ 66% below
Nitrite 1 1976 100%
1% of limit ↑ 129% above
Sodium 21 1976–1988 100%
↑ 210% above
pH 22 1965–1988 100%
~ typical
PFBS municipal 10 2024–2025 0%
Hardness 22 1965–1988 100%
↑ 284% above

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 22 samples
  • Sulfate 22 samples
  • Manganese 22 samples
  • Arsenic 21 samples
  • Chloride 26 samples
  • Fluoride 21 samples
  • Sodium 21 samples
  • pH 22 samples
  • Hardness 22 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Radon 1 sample
  • Uranium 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Nitrate 2 samples
  • Nitrite 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Gratiot County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Gratiot County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Gratiot County

79 Active public water systems
39,129 Residents on public water
6% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Gratiot County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Gratiot County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Gratiot County Prevalence MI Average Source Year
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 2.9% 3.2% 2020
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 7.5% 7.2% 2023
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 7.1% 7.2% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Gratiot County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →