Data & Methodology — Emmet County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Emmet County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

6066 total samples analyzed across 20 analytes. Data spans 1977 to 2020.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Iron 11 1977–2005 100%
40% of limit ↓ 80% below
Fluoride 3 1977–1982 100%
12% of limit ↑ 57% above
Chloride 59 1977–2011 88%
4% of limit ↓ 69% below
Sulfate 10 1977–2010 90%
2% of limit ↓ 85% below
PFNA municipal 8 2024 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 8 2024 0%
0% of limit
Uranium 2 1982 100%
1% of limit ↓ 27% below
PFOA municipal 8 2024 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 8 2024 0%
0% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 8 2024 0%
0% of limit
Arsenic 2 1982–2005 50%
10% of limit ↓ 69% below
E. coli 1 2008 0%
Nitrite 1 2009 0%
Lead 1 1977 0%
Manganese 1 1977 0%
Hardness 3 1995 100% ~ typical
pH 9 1977–2020 100% ~ typical
Nitrate 1 1977 0%
Sodium 13 1977–2017 100% ↓ 81% below
PFBS municipal 8 2024 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Chloride 59 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Iron 11 samples
  • Fluoride 3 samples
  • Sulfate 10 samples
  • Uranium 2 samples
  • PFOA 8 samples
  • Arsenic 2 samples
  • E. coli 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Manganese 1 sample
  • Hardness 3 samples
  • pH 9 samples
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • Sodium 13 samples

Public vs. Private Water in Emmet County

206 Active public water systems
39,314 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Emmet County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-27

Full methodology →