Data & Methodology — Crawford County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Crawford County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

932 total samples analyzed across 13 analytes. Data spans 1963 to 2009.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Iron 2 1976–1978 50%
227% of limit ~ typical
Chloride 8 1963–1971 88%
2% of limit ↓ 87% below
Sulfate 7 1963–1971 86%
3% of limit ↓ 81% below
Fluoride 2 1966–1967 50%
2% of limit ↓ 69% below
Arsenic 3 1978–2004 67%
45% of limit ↑ 41% above
Uranium 3 1978–1980 100%
1% of limit ↓ 27% below
Radon 2 1991 100%
17% of limit ↓ 52% below
Sodium 20 1963–2008 100% ↓ 83% below
pH 7 1963–2009 100% ~ typical
Nitrite 1 1980 0%
Nitrate 1 1971 0%
Manganese 1 1978 0%
Lead 1 2004 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Sodium 20 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Iron 2 samples
  • Chloride 8 samples
  • Sulfate 7 samples
  • Fluoride 2 samples
  • Arsenic 3 samples
  • Uranium 3 samples
  • Radon 2 samples
  • pH 7 samples
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • Manganese 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Crawford County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Crawford County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Crawford County

97 Active public water systems
17,965 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Crawford County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-27

Full methodology →