Data & Methodology — Benzie County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Benzie County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

34 well testing events on record, covering 16 analytes. Data spans 1971 to 2024.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Iron 8 1977–1982 100%
43% of limit ↓ 78% below
Arsenic 8 1977–1982 88%
20% of limit ↓ 38% below
Chloride 8 1977–1982 100%
26% of limit ↑ 108% above
Fluoride 8 1977–1982 75%
11% of limit ↑ 42% above
Lead 10 1977–1982 0%
Manganese 8 1977–1982 75%
15% of limit ↓ 89% below
Nitrate 8 1977–1982 75%
1% of limit ↓ 72% below
Nitrite 8 1977–1982 25%
2% of limit ↑ 358% above
PFNA 24 2021–2022 58%
0% of limit
PFOA 24 2021–2022 79%
0% of limit
PFOS 24 2021–2022 4%
0% of limit
Sulfate 8 1977–1982 100%
5% of limit ↓ 69% below
Uranium 4 1981–1982 100%
0% of limit ↓ 56% below
Sodium 8 1977–1982 100%
↓ 51% below
pH 8 1977–1982 100%
~ typical
Hardness 8 1977–1982 100%
↑ 107% above

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • PFNA 24 samples
  • PFOA 24 samples
  • PFOS 24 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Iron 8 samples
  • Arsenic 8 samples
  • Chloride 8 samples
  • Fluoride 8 samples
  • Lead 10 samples
  • Manganese 8 samples
  • Nitrate 8 samples
  • Nitrite 8 samples
  • Sulfate 8 samples
  • Uranium 4 samples
  • Sodium 8 samples
  • pH 8 samples
  • Hardness 8 samples

Public vs. Private Water in Benzie County

113 Active public water systems
25,693 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Benzie County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →