Data & Methodology — Baraga County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Baraga County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

17606 total samples analyzed across 17 analytes. Data spans 1961 to 2009.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Manganese 2 1962–1963 50%
800% of limit ↑ 483% above
Iron 53 1961–2009 98%
51% of limit ↓ 74% below
Sulfate 36 1961–2008 97%
2% of limit ↓ 89% below
Nitrate 15 2001–2002 93%
1% of limit ↓ 69% below
Chloride 52 1962–2009 98%
1% of limit ↓ 95% below
Fluoride 14 1962–2007 93%
3% of limit ↓ 65% below
Uranium 31 1980–2009 100%
0% of limit ↓ 69% below
PFOA 1 2010 0%
0% of limit
Nitrite 1 1963 0%
Sodium 45 1962–2009 98% ↓ 85% below
Total Coliform 1 2002 0%
E. coli 1 2008 0%
Fecal Coliform 1 2001 0%
pH 11 1962–2007 91% ~ typical
Arsenic 1 1963 0%
Lead 1 1963 0%
Hardness 2 2001 50% ↓ 37% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 53 samples
  • Sulfate 36 samples
  • Nitrate 15 samples
  • Chloride 52 samples
  • Uranium 31 samples
  • Sodium 45 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Manganese 2 samples
  • Fluoride 14 samples
  • PFOA 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • E. coli 1 sample
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • pH 11 samples
  • Arsenic 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Hardness 2 samples

Public vs. Private Water in Baraga County

23 Active public water systems
5,580 Residents on public water
32% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Baraga County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-27

Full methodology →