Data & Methodology — Baraga County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Baraga County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

27 well testing events on record, covering 14 analytes. Data spans 1961 to 2009.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MI Avg
Manganese 26 1977–1997 92%
34% of limit ↓ 75% below
Iron 26 1977–1997 100%
28% of limit ↓ 86% below
Arsenic 16 1977–1991 56%
20% of limit ↓ 38% below
Chloride 26 1977–1997 100%
1% of limit ↓ 88% below
Fluoride 26 1977–1997 77%
5% of limit ↓ 37% below
Lead 16 1977–1991 6%
13% of limit ↑ 25% above
Nitrate 26 1977–1997 50%
1% of limit ↓ 70% below
Nitrite 26 1977–1997 15%
1% of limit ↑ 129% above
PFOA 1 2010 0%
Sulfate 26 1977–1997 92%
2% of limit ↓ 86% below
Uranium 4 1980–1988 100%
7% of limit ↑ 648% above
Sodium 26 1977–1997 100%
↓ 50% below
pH 26 1977–1997 100%
~ typical
Hardness 26 1977–1997 100%
~ typical

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MI.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 26 samples
  • Iron 26 samples
  • Arsenic 16 samples
  • Chloride 26 samples
  • Fluoride 26 samples
  • Lead 16 samples
  • Nitrate 26 samples
  • Nitrite 26 samples
  • Sulfate 26 samples
  • Sodium 26 samples
  • pH 26 samples
  • Hardness 26 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • PFOA 1 sample
  • Uranium 4 samples

Public vs. Private Water in Baraga County

23 Active public water systems
5,580 Residents on public water
32% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Baraga County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MI with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →