Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Lake County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
712 well testing events on record, covering
23 analytes.
Data spans 1948 to 2017.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. FL Avg
PFOS
municipal
83
2023–2025
43%
150% of limit
↓ 29% below
Iron
630
1968–2025
99%
7% of limit
↓ 96% below
PFOA
municipal
83
2023–2025
20%
128% of limit
~ typical
Chloride
655
1968–2025
100%
5% of limit
↓ 90% below
Manganese
580
1977–2025
99%
6% of limit
↓ 79% below
Nitrate
35
1968–2015
60%
4% of limit
~ typical
Sulfate
578
1968–2025
98%
4% of limit
↓ 85% below
PFHxS
municipal
83
2023–2025
39%
37% of limit
↓ 28% below
Arsenic
576
1977–2025
97%
5% of limit
↓ 62% below
Lead
579
1977–2025
96%
0% of limit
↓ 89% below
Fluoride
129
1968–2025
83%
3% of limit
↓ 59% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
83
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrite
33
1972–2015
39%
2% of limit
↑ 92% above
PFNA
municipal
83
2023–2025
1%
40% of limit
↓ 31% below
Radon
3
2002–2015
100%
16% of limit
↓ 44% below
Uranium
3
2002–2015
67%
1% of limit
↓ 27% below
Sodium
655
1968–2025
100%
—
↓ 91% below
pH
660
1968–2025
100%
—
~ typical
Hardness
58
1968–2015
100%
—
↓ 44% below
Total Coliform
44
1973–2025
98%
—
~ typical
E. coli
19
2015–2025
95%
—
~ typical
Fecal Coliform
25
1977–2021
100%
—
~ typical
PFBS
municipal
83
2023–2025
42%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across FL.
Compare your result with Lake County
Of the 576 arsenic tests on record for Lake County (1977–2025),
3% found none, and half were below 0.5 µg/L.
Of the 655 chloride tests on record for Lake County (1968–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 11.8 mg/L.
Of the 129 fluoride tests on record for Lake County (1968–2025),
17% found none, and half were below 100 µg/L.
Of the 630 iron tests on record for Lake County (1968–2025),
1% found none, and half were below 21.7 µg/L.
Of the 579 lead tests on record for Lake County (1977–2025),
4% found none, and half were below 50 ng/L.
Of the 580 manganese tests on record for Lake County (1977–2025),
1% found none, and half were below 2.64 µg/L.
Of the 35 nitrate tests on record for Lake County (1968–2015),
40% found none, and half were below 10 µg/L.
Of the 578 sulfate tests on record for Lake County (1968–2025),
2% found none, and half were below 9.75 mg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Iron 630 samples
Chloride 655 samples
Manganese 580 samples
Nitrate 35 samples
Sulfate 578 samples
Arsenic 576 samples
Lead 579 samples
Fluoride 129 samples
Nitrite 33 samples
Sodium 655 samples
pH 660 samples
Hardness 58 samples
Total Coliform 44 samples
E. coli 19 samples
Fecal Coliform 25 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Radon 3 samples
Uranium 3 samples
No private-well PFAS data for Lake County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Lake County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Lake County
274Active public water systems
431,469Residents on public water
23%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Lake County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Lake County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Lake County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Lake County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Lake County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Lake County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Lake County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in FL with at least one sample for that analyte.