Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Citrus County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
3043 well testing events on record, covering
23 analytes.
Data spans 1956 to 2025.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. FL Avg
Chloride
2907
1964–2025
100%
52% of limit
~ typical
Iron
1342
1965–2025
99%
3% of limit
↓ 99% below
Sulfate
1448
1965–2025
100%
7% of limit
↓ 73% below
PFOS
municipal
40
2023–2025
10%
251% of limit
~ typical
Arsenic
22
1985–2024
100%
8% of limit
↓ 37% below
Manganese
1291
1987–2025
100%
3% of limit
↓ 89% below
PFHxS
municipal
40
2023–2025
10%
80% of limit
↑ 56% above
Radon
1
2002
100%
10% of limit
↓ 66% below
Uranium
1
2002
100%
0% of limit
↓ 52% below
Lead
23
1985–2024
96%
1% of limit
↓ 58% below
Nitrate
89
1965–2012
69%
2% of limit
↓ 51% below
Fluoride
1285
1965–2025
99%
2% of limit
↓ 65% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
40
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrite
1121
1968–2025
97%
0% of limit
↓ 90% below
PFNA
municipal
40
2023–2025
0%
—
—
PFOA
municipal
40
2023–2025
0%
—
—
PFBS
municipal
40
2023–2025
8%
—
↓ 28% below
E. coli
8
2002–2024
100%
—
~ typical
Fecal Coliform
12
1989–2020
86%
—
~ typical
Total Coliform
20
1968–2024
82%
—
~ typical
pH
1182
1965–2025
100%
—
~ typical
Sodium
1388
1965–2025
100%
—
↓ 32% below
Hardness
138
1965–2012
100%
—
↓ 52% below
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across FL.
Compare your result with Citrus County
Of the 22 arsenic tests on record for Citrus County (1985–2024),
0% found none, and half were below 0.82 µg/L.
Of the 2907 chloride tests on record for Citrus County (1964–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 131 mg/L.
Of the 1285 fluoride tests on record for Citrus County (1965–2025),
1% found none, and half were below 100 µg/L.
Of the 1342 iron tests on record for Citrus County (1965–2025),
1% found none, and half were below 8.5 µg/L.
Of the 23 lead tests on record for Citrus County (1985–2024),
4% found none, and half were below 0.2 µg/L.
Of the 1291 manganese tests on record for Citrus County (1987–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 1.37 µg/L.
Of the 89 nitrate tests on record for Citrus County (1965–2012),
31% found none.
Of the 1448 sulfate tests on record for Citrus County (1965–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 17.7 mg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Chloride 2907 samples
Iron 1342 samples
Sulfate 1448 samples
Arsenic 22 samples
Manganese 1291 samples
Lead 23 samples
Nitrate 89 samples
Fluoride 1285 samples
Nitrite 1121 samples
Total Coliform 20 samples
pH 1182 samples
Sodium 1388 samples
Hardness 138 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Radon 1 sample
Uranium 1 sample
E. coli 8 samples
Fecal Coliform 12 samples
No private-well PFAS data for Citrus County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Citrus County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Citrus County
149Active public water systems
123,866Residents on public water
31%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Citrus County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Citrus County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Citrus County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Citrus County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Citrus County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Citrus County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Citrus County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in FL with at least one sample for that analyte.