Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Charlotte County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
877 well testing events on record, covering
23 analytes.
Data spans 1924 to 2025.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. FL Avg
Radon
3
2019
100%
973% of limit
↑ 3218% above
Chloride
835
1924–2025
100%
184% of limit
↑ 277% above
Sulfate
768
1924–2025
100%
99% of limit
↑ 277% above
PFOA
municipal
13
2023–2024
15%
116% of limit
~ typical
Iron
533
1924–2025
99%
3% of limit
↓ 99% below
PFOS
municipal
13
2023–2024
8%
108% of limit
↓ 49% below
Nitrate
55
1949–2019
95%
1% of limit
↓ 84% below
Manganese
516
1979–2025
98%
1% of limit
↓ 95% below
Fluoride
674
1949–2025
100%
23% of limit
↑ 224% above
Nitrite
15
1973–2019
33%
0% of limit
↓ 68% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
13
2023–2024
0%
—
—
Arsenic
33
1979–2024
94%
2% of limit
↓ 86% below
PFNA
municipal
13
2023–2024
0%
—
—
Uranium
3
2019
100%
0% of limit
↓ 64% below
PFHxS
municipal
13
2023–2024
0%
—
—
Lead
42
1975–2024
67%
1% of limit
↓ 58% below
Sodium
621
1924–2025
100%
—
↑ 375% above
pH
600
1949–2025
100%
—
~ typical
PFBS
municipal
13
2023–2024
46%
—
~ typical
E. coli
14
2019–2024
79%
—
~ typical
Fecal Coliform
17
2017–2021
100%
—
~ typical
Hardness
182
1924–2019
100%
—
↑ 95% above
Total Coliform
31
2017–2024
90%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across FL.
Compare your result with Charlotte County
Of the 33 arsenic tests on record for Charlotte County (1979–2024),
6% found none, and half were below 0.15 µg/L.
Of the 835 chloride tests on record for Charlotte County (1924–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 461 mg/L.
Of the 674 fluoride tests on record for Charlotte County (1949–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 920 µg/L.
Of the 533 iron tests on record for Charlotte County (1924–2025),
1% found none, and half were below 8.5 µg/L.
Of the 42 lead tests on record for Charlotte County (1975–2024),
33% found none, and half were below 50 ng/L.
Of the 516 manganese tests on record for Charlotte County (1979–2025),
2% found none, and half were below 0.63 µg/L.
Of the 55 nitrate tests on record for Charlotte County (1949–2019),
5% found none, and half were below 45 µg/L.
Of the 768 sulfate tests on record for Charlotte County (1924–2025),
0% found none, and half were below 244 mg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Chloride 835 samples
Sulfate 768 samples
Iron 533 samples
Nitrate 55 samples
Manganese 516 samples
Fluoride 674 samples
Nitrite 15 samples
Arsenic 33 samples
Lead 42 samples
Sodium 621 samples
pH 600 samples
Fecal Coliform 17 samples
Hardness 182 samples
Total Coliform 31 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Radon 3 samples
Uranium 3 samples
E. coli 14 samples
No private-well PFAS data for Charlotte County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Charlotte County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Charlotte County
29Active public water systems
259,220Residents on public water
8%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Charlotte County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Charlotte County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Charlotte County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Charlotte County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Charlotte County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Charlotte County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Charlotte County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in FL with at least one sample for that analyte.