Data & Methodology — Contra Costa County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Contra Costa County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

1237 well testing events on record, covering 18 analytes. Data spans 1951 to 2017.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. CA Avg
Manganese 80 1974–1991 72%
420% of limit ↑ 36% above
Chloride 1191 1957–1991 100%
76% of limit ↑ 153% above
Nitrate 142 1957–1983 96%
41% of limit ↑ 73% above
Iron 92 1958–1991 66%
13% of limit ↓ 89% below
Sulfate 123 1957–1991 100%
34% of limit ↑ 66% above
Lead 15 1974–1991 0%
— —
PFHxS municipal 48 2023–2025 0%
— —
Arsenic 9 1974–1979 78%
20% of limit ↓ 49% below
PFOA municipal 48 2023–2025 0%
— —
Fluoride 116 1957–1991 98%
10% of limit ↑ 44% above
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 48 2023–2025 0%
— —
Nitrite 71 1976–1983 63%
1% of limit ~ typical
PFOS municipal 48 2023–2025 0%
— —
PFNA municipal 48 2023–2025 0%
— —
pH 270 1957–1991 100%
— ~ typical
PFBS municipal 48 2023–2025 0%
— —
Sodium 139 1957–1991 100%
— ↑ 60% above
Hardness 147 1957–1991 100%
— ↑ 56% above

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across CA.

Compare your result with Contra Costa County

Of the 1191 chloride tests on record for Contra Costa County (1957–1991), 0% found none, and half were below 190 mg/L.

Of the 116 fluoride tests on record for Contra Costa County (1957–1991), 2% found none, and half were below 400 µg/L.

Of the 92 iron tests on record for Contra Costa County (1958–1991), 34% found none, and half were below 20 µg/L.

Of the 80 manganese tests on record for Contra Costa County (1974–1991), 28% found none, and half were below 70 µg/L.

Of the 142 nitrate tests on record for Contra Costa County (1957–1983), 4% found none, and half were below 3.92 mg/L.

Of the 123 sulfate tests on record for Contra Costa County (1957–1991), 0% found none, and half were below 84 mg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 80 samples
  • Chloride 1191 samples
  • Nitrate 142 samples
  • Iron 92 samples
  • Sulfate 123 samples
  • Lead 15 samples
  • Fluoride 116 samples
  • Nitrite 71 samples
  • pH 270 samples
  • Sodium 139 samples
  • Hardness 147 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Arsenic 9 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Contra Costa County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Contra Costa County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Contra Costa County

84 Active public water systems
564,952 Residents on public water
8% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Contra Costa County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Contra Costa County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Contra Costa County Prevalence CA Average Source Year
Nitrate Cancer prevalence 6.3% 6.2% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Contra Costa County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in CA with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-09-10

Full methodology →